Selection criteria

Grading criteria

Primary indicators

• Clear abstract of what the candidate wants to research
• Extent to which the work programme has been well researched (including references to key literature); and the extent of engagement with the host supervisor
• Quality of the research proposal, including innovation and relevance to current research in the chosen field and to development policy

Secondary indicators

• Clarity of expression
• Feasibility of proposed research
• Likelihood of completion within three years

For Split-Site awards:

• Relevance of work in UK to PhD
• Evidence of strong research link with UK institution

Grading criteria

Primary indicators

• Statement of what the candidate wants to learn and how it relates to their objectives
• Extent to which the proposed course and institution of study have been well researched (including specific options and dissertation topics, where appropriate) and presented

Secondary indicators

• Existing offer of admission to the course
• Clarity of presentation

Grading criteria

Primary indicators

• Extent of the need: how the plan of study/research relates to development in the sector and country
• Expected outcomes, the projected timeframe to achieve them and potential beneficiaries
• The way and extent to which the candidate proposes to apply new skills and qualifications; how does this relate to development

Secondary indicators

• Examples of leadership (including strong communication skills, problem solving, adaptability, strategic thinking)
• Evidence advocacy work
• Volunteering Experience, particularly to the development agenda
• Reference to a national development priority or capacity shortage
• Reference to the selected CSC theme
• Extent of the benefit: how the impact of the work might be measured
• Leading or participating in relevant projects or programmes